• Directions Button 57     Call Us.      

  • Innovations at PBD: Digital Impressions

    In the evolving field of dentistry, technological advancements continue to improve patient care and treatment outcomes. One innovation that has gained significant attention is digital scanning. In the modern dental practice, scanning has replaced most traditional impressions, offering numerous advantages in terms of accuracy, patient comfort, and overall efficiency. In this article, we will briefly discuss the advantages of digital scanning using supporting evidence from scientific references – to shed light on how this technology is transforming dental practices.

    Enhanced Accuracy and Precision

    Digital scanning in dentistry relies on advanced 3D imaging technology, which allows for highly accurate and precise impressions of a patient’s oral anatomy. Unlike traditional impression methods, digital scans eliminate the risk of distortions, voids, and inaccuracies that can occur with physical molds. A study published in the Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry (2019) [1] found that digital scans consistently outperformed traditional methods, reducing the margin of error.

    Improved Patient Comfort

    For many patients, the thought of having traditional dental impressions taken using bulky trays and gooey impression materials can be anxiety-inducing. Digital scanning offers a more comfortable experience, as it involves the use of a small, handheld wand to capture the intraoral images and patients are far less likely to gag according to the finding of Mangano F, et. al [2].

    Time/Efficiency

    Time is of the essence in dentistry, both for patients and practitioners. The scanning process is faster than traditional impression-taking (and retaking!) methods. A systematic review published in the Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry (2020) [3] highlighted the time-saving advantages of digital impressions.

    Reduced Material Waste

    Traditional dental impressions generate substantial waste due to the use of impression trays and materials. In contrast, digital scanning is a more eco-friendly option, as it eliminates the need for disposable items and minimizes the environmental footprint of dental procedures. A study in the Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery (2018) [4] emphasized the environmental benefits of digital scanning in dental practices.

    Streamlined Workflow

    Digital scans can be seamlessly integrated into various aspects of the dental workflow, from treatment planning to the creation of restorations. This streamlining of processes reduces the likelihood of errors and enhances communication between dental teams and laboratories. An article in the Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry (2019) [5] highlighted the improved workflow efficiency afforded by digital scanning.

    Conclusion

    The advantages of digital scanning are evident from both scientific studies and clinical practice. This technology not only enhances accuracy, patient comfort, and time efficiency but also contributes to a more sustainable and streamlined dental workflow.

    I hope this article has given you an insight into the innovations of a modern dental practice.  If you have a question you’d like answered, please email me at pbd@parkblvddentistry.com.

    Share if you care!  Please feel free to share this or any Dental Health Matters article and if you have any questions, please feel free to email me at Doodes@ParkBlvdDentistry.com.  Who knows, maybe your question will be the subject of another edition!

    References:

    1. Joda T, Brägger U. (2019). Digital vs. conventional implant impressions: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 122(5), 493-499.

    2.  Mangano F, Gandolfi A, Luongo G, Logozzo S. (2017). Intraoral scanners in dentistry: a review of the current literature. Journal of Dentistry, 63, 1-17.

    3.  Revilla-León M, et al. (2020). Digital vs. conventional complete-arch impressions for single-unit copings and three-unit fixed partial dentures: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 123(3), 419-426.

    4.  Rusu LC, Pop A, Didilescu AC, Luchian I. (2018). Digital dental impressions: an ecological way to obtain 3D models—comparative study. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 76(10), 2295-2300.

    5. Zimmermann M, Koller C, Rumetsch M, Ender A, Mehl A. (2019). Precision of guided scanning procedures for full-arch digital impressions in vivo. Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry, 31(4), 343-349.